Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 798 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-9400F - 192 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - €129.0 vs €140.0
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77836 minutes ago
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
64.93873704052781%
Multi-Core
4834
59.03761602344895%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |