Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G1610 - 251 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
250
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 434 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |