Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 490 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930T - 191 vs 190 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
94.32013769363166%
Multi-Core
948
95.56451612903226%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |