Buy on Amazon
€74.44
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 98 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Celeron G3930T - 183 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processoro da 3.6GHz, 64bit, Socket AM4, 14 nm, Cores 6, Threads 12, TDP 95W
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
48.79786286731968%
Multi-Core
948
19.89089383130508%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
