Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 and Celeron G3930T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930T - 46 vs 45 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 492 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
90.13157894736842%
Multi-Core
948
90.89165867689357%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |