Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 1207 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - €50.95 vs €177.47
- Up to 66% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 3100 - €0.32 vs €0.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 17% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3930 - 186 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
159
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13468 minutes ago
Buy for €177.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |