Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - €48.88 vs €179.46
- Up to 70% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 7 5700X - €0.38 vs €1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3930 - 142 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 387 minutes ago
Buy for €179.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |