Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 551 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €50.95 vs €188.88
- Up to 72% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-6600K - €0.29 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 51 vs 91 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Celeron G3930 - 184 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
177
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13933 minutes ago
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |