Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 978 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - 336 vs 322 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €19.0 vs €50.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930 - €0.06 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
336
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |