Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 98 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - €63.66 vs €74.44
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 9% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G3930 - 227 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
54.140694568121106%
Multi-Core
1043
21.884179605539238%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |