Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3570 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3570 is 1677 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €33.99 vs €47.48
- Up to 29% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930 - €0.2 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-3570 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |