Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1786 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 2% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €49.99 vs €50.95
- Up to 2% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3930 - €0.43 vs €0.44 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18091 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |