Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1677 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €42.73 vs €50.95
- Up to 14% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3930 - €0.19 vs €0.22 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17053 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17053 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |