Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 994 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - €50.95 vs €97.29
- Up to 33% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen 5 3500X - €0.82 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 27% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G3930 - 79 vs 62 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
62
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 295 minutes ago
Buy for €97.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |