Buy on Amazon
€63.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G2120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1583 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G2120.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G2120 - 227 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Pentium G2120 - €63.66 vs €106.09
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Pentium G2120 - 51 vs 55 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74366 minutes ago
Intel BX80637G2120 CPU Intel Pentium D G2120, 3.10 GHz, 3 MB Cache, LGA1155, Nero
Buy for €106.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Pentium G2120
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G2120
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
526
86.51315789473685%
Multi-Core
922
88.39884947267498%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Pentium G2120 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
