Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 264 vs 254 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €102.0 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
254
96.21212121212122%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
26%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74960 minutes ago
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
59.56144824069353%
Multi-Core
5794
76.15667718191378%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |