Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 385 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €117.5 vs €520.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-12900KS - €0.16 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 6% better in Rocket League than Core i5-11400F - 790 vs 746 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
746
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13252 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
790
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
24%
Price, €
€520.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €520.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |