Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €117.5 vs €466.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €1.75 vs €5.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Core i5-11400F - 82 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
67
81%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14139 minutes ago
Buy for €466.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |