Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1293 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 232 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €117.5 vs €379.64
- Up to 71% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.51 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
232
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5250 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
216
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
28%
Price, €
€379.64
30%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |