Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 232 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10850K - 187 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €117.5 vs €342.73
- Up to 66% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10850K - €0.63 vs €1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14079 minutes ago
Buy for €342.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14080 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |