Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 355% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G1610 - 100 vs 22 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €72.66 vs €690.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €3.3 vs €6.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 55 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |