Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2894 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 11% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1610 - 235 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - €72.66 vs €136.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Fortnite than Ryzen 5 5600X - €0.34 vs €0.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €136 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
212
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |