Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 48% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1610 - 883 vs 598 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - €72.66 vs €392.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 9 7900X - €0.12 vs €0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €392 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
598
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 55 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |