Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 24% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1610 - 743 vs 598 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - €72.66 vs €233.17
- Up to 61% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - €0.12 vs €0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
743
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
39%
Price, €
€233.17
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €233.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
598
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |