Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 46% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1610 - 131 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €72.66 vs €554.23
- Up to 81% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €0.81 vs €4.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.23/FPS
19%
Price, €
€554.23
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €554.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
90
69%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 55 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |