Buy on Amazon
€314
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2894 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 78% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1610 - 230 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €72.66 vs €314.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.56 vs €1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD Processore Ryzen 9 5950X (16 C/32 T, 72 MB di cache, boost massimo fino a 4,9 GHz)
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
129
56%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
