Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2894 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 64% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1610 - 148 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - €88.88 vs €212.72
- Up to 31% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Ryzen 7 5800X - €0.99 vs €1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €212.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5133 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
90
60%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |