Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 18% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - 150 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 28 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - €88.88 vs €398.79
- Up to 74% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-14700KF - €0.7 vs €2.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
26%
Price, €
€398.79
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €398.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
127
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 2 |
28 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |