Buy on Amazon
£29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £29.0 vs £426.38
- Up to 93% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900KF - £0.15 vs £2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Core i5-3470S - 207 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 20 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
191
92.27053140096618%
Value, £/FPS
£0.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3470S - i5-3470S
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2331 minutes ago
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.06/FPS
7.281553398058252%
Price, £
£426.38
6%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900KF
Buy for £426.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
34.2597844583097%
Multi-Core
1724
18.833296919379507%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
