Buy on Amazon
£29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $699
Availability
MSRP in USD: $699
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3877 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £29.0 vs £533.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i9-13900KS - £0.27 vs £1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 232% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-3470S - 362 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 32 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-3470S - i5-3470S
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
362
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.48/FPS
18%
Price, £
£533.99
5%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-13900KS, 24 (8p+16e) Cores, 32 Threads, 32 MB Cache
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
