Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3869 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £29.0 vs £419.33
- Up to 92% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-13900 - £0.12 vs £1.5 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 11% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-3470S - 279 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 32 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
251
89.96415770609319%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2460 minutes ago
Buy for £419.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
22.254974207811347%
Multi-Core
1724
10.495555826129307%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |