Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 68% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-9700F - 94 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-9700F - £4.46 vs £4.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £328.66 vs £419.33
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
94
100%
Value, £/FPS
£4.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£419.33
78%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £419.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
56
59.57446808510638%
Value, £/FPS
£4.62/FPS
96.53679653679653%
Price, £
£328.66
100%
Buy for £328.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1549
57.074428887251294%
Multi-Core
6256
38.08596128089614%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |