Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 82% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 322 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - £437.44 vs £446.34
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £446.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74365 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
177
54.96894409937888%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£437.44
100%
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
46.94178334561533%
Multi-Core
7454
45.37927675636186%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |