Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £437.44 vs £451.82
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 214 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
176
82.2429906542056%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£437.44
100%
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74432 minutes ago
Buy for £451.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74431 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
42.83792871553464%
Multi-Core
7454
36.996227913440535%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |