Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1923 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 199 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £197.85 vs £521.99
- Up to 67% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £0.99 vs £2.97 per FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for £521.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
199
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£197.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £197.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |