Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £195.98 vs £489.35
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900K - £1.31 vs £3.0 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14400F - 163 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
150
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£195.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £195.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Buy for £489.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |