Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 83 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £195.48 vs £523.99
- Up to 60% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-14900K - £1.34 vs £3.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-14400F - 158 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
146
92%
Value, £/FPS
£1.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£195.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £195.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.32/FPS
40%
Price, £
£523.99
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for £523.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |