Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £195.48 vs £465.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing New World than Core i9-13900KF - £1.4 vs £2.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in New World than Core i5-14400F - 162 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
86%
Value, £/FPS
£1.4/FPS
100%
Price, £
£195.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £195.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.88/FPS
48%
Price, £
£465.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |