Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-12900KS on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 175 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-12900KS.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-12900KS - 231 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - £465.99 vs £481.99
- Up to 5% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-12900KS - £2.02 vs £2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.02/FPS
100%
Price, £
£465.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £465.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Buy for £481.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |