Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 258 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £437.44 vs £451.82
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for £451.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74159 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
219
84.88372093023256%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£437.44
100%
Buy for £437.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
42.83792871553464%
Multi-Core
7454
36.996227913440535%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |