Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £431.98 vs £486.04
- Up to 1% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900KF - £1.93 vs £1.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 251 vs 224 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
224
89%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
100%
Price, £
£431.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £431.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4355 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
251
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.94/FPS
99%
Price, £
£486.04
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for £486.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |