Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 575 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - £351.64 vs £431.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 211 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
189
89.57345971563981%
Value, £/FPS
£1.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£351.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Buy for £431 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
72.26318774815655%
Multi-Core
7454
81.42888354817566%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |