Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1280 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 157 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 150 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
129
82.16560509554141%
Value, £/FPS
£2.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£351.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
47.32540861812778%
Multi-Core
7454
45.94711212476114%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 150 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |