Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £346.0 vs £519.8
- Up to 20% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - £0.98 vs £1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 19% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-9700F - 423 vs 354 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
354
83%
Value, £/FPS
£0.98/FPS
100%
Price, £
£346
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £346 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
423
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.23/FPS
79%
Price, £
£519.8
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for £519.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |