Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 7950X3D on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 8 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £515.88 vs £533.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KS - £2.32 vs £2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 120 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 225 vs 222 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
222
98%
Value, £/FPS
£2.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£515.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £515.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.37/FPS
97%
Price, £
£533.99
96%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 150 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |