Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10900K - 159 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £449.0 vs £533.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900KS - £3.28 vs £3.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.36/FPS
97%
Price, £
£533.99
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for £533.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
86%
Value, £/FPS
£3.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£449
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |