Buy on Amazon
£29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2978 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - £29.0 vs £482.7
- Up to 93% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10850K - £0.13 vs £1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3470S - 247 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
231
93.52226720647774%
Value, £/FPS
£0.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3470S - i5-3470S
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2444 minutes ago
Core i9-10850K
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
247
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.95/FPS
6.666666666666667%
Price, £
£482.7
6%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10850K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for £482.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-10850K
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
34.71264367816092%
Multi-Core
1724
18.953386103781884%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
