Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 88 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900F - 113 vs 112 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - £246.78 vs £295.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10850K - £2.2 vs £2.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18693 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
99%
Value, £/FPS
£2.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£246.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £246.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |