Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - £246.78 vs £280.13
- Up to 3% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13600K - £1.81 vs £1.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-10900F - 151 vs 136 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
90%
Value, £/FPS
£1.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£246.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £246.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7636 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
151
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.86/FPS
97%
Price, £
£280.13
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for £280.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7636 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |