Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-10900F - 587 vs 542 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - £185.8 vs £325.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74051 minutes ago
Buy for £185.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
58.53999301432064%
Multi-Core
8426
65.79214492074647%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |